SHUTTLE W 0 3 E C T S FRR REQUIREUENTS

L R c v l c v C o n c e ~7he Shuttle Prciects F R R v U I employ a d e l t a review concept D horn prior r e v ~ e vand ~ previous STS mimi-. n m

b. kberdule: TheShittUe Projects F R R will be held prior m the C c n t e r F R R c w ," l"

¶c. The major agenda i t e r r s and responsibilities ua

. (1) Introduction Prgrunr P ~ M and Management SystemsOffice

389

¶SOP 8000.1

(0) Solid Rocker Boaster h!awger, So!id RockTt 6ooster Projecr O f f i c e

¶(5) Flight Engine Manager, Flight Engine Project

¶Office

¶(6) Action ItemdReadlness Program Plena and Mancgement

¶Poll Syrte.~ O f~f i c e d Presentation E m o h a s i s The presentation of agenda items vil! n o r m d t y inc)vde a brief status summary with appropriate sv;.p>:ting detaU on significant items m d c o n d u d e with a readiness asxsrrnent. The p-esen:ation -pic% &nd scope should be developed from the Prcjec: FRR's m d s?wld:

¶(I) k that required t a p u v i d e t h e S ! ~ ~ : t i eP r o ) c c t s h!mAger and Review T e a m

v l t h t h e informatior. needed to make M iniependent judgement u to flight readiness

¶(2) review recent significant rcsc!ved proS!erns and p-ior fiight anomalies when necessary to establish confiderre;

¶(1) cover alI problem& technical iswes, open items, and a m z r r a i n t r remaining to be resolved before r4e flight;

¶(0) establish the flight baseline c o n f i g u a t i o n in t e r m s of all d g n i f i c m t changes since the last flight d o r applicable STS fllghht.

¶Within Chc above g d d e l i n a , t h e rope of the review should w v e r status, chuigger - . and issues in a r e a s such as:

H a r d w r r d S o f t v a r e A n m d i c r , Failures including development and acceptance test failures L a m c h Commit Criteria Flight PlantlRules Vchicie Checkout Shortages and Opt? Fork Prior Flight Anomalies As-bui!? Hardware Configuration versus Certified H a r d v u e L i s t Critical Item L i s t ( C L W i a u r d s bevelo~ent, .Qua.!ifiCAtiOn, and Reliability Tating (CwtifiutionlVeriflcati~) V L v e n ud Deviations Limited L i f e Components LarnFh Critical Sparer S n u k Circuits Plight Margitu PAS Assessment Safety Process Olanger Cc':&-,, smu!.>ctxing, checkout m d Lunch processing

390

¶SOP 1000.1

s. Shuttle Proiccts FRR McmbcrshiDr The MaNger, Shuttle Projects v l l l establish revicv membership and K r v e As Chairman. k k m b e r h l p viU comprise representation from the foilowing organirationu ProxramlProjcct Offices S c l n r e & t n r i n r t r i n i Directorate Rellabillty & Quality Assuraxe

S.Ir(y Contractors bSB1, MMC, Thiokol, Rocketdyne

¶t Documentation R m i r e m e n t s

(I) Presentations Vugraphs will be w e d for F R R presentations ud paper cup~esvrll be provided to the rcvicving officials.

(2) Statement of Fliiht Readiness Statement of Flight Readiness r i l l b e executed by all Probect Mam8ers and submitted at the conciulion of t h e review. _-

¶g. FRR Action Itemlopen Item Closeout Reportin&Rmuiremcnts

u (1) Subsequent m lhe condusion of the Shuttle Projects FRR, a copy of aui8ncd action Items v1U be provided to each actionee by the Program Plans ud Management Systems Office. 0 ) T h e FRR wcrcUry will track dl action items ud provide status to me Shuttle Project3 M a N 6 n .

(3) Closeouts to FRR action I t e m 5 vill be u b m l t t e d to lhe Program Plara and Management Systems Office in writins and will state fully the baais for closeout, that is action taken, results obtained, and &terminations made. The Program Plans and Management Systems Office vlll u b r n i t closures to the Manager, Shuttle Projects Q NS designated reprerentative lor signature.

¶h. Procedures

u CI

(I) SinKlc Points of C o n t a c c FRR planning and procecturca will be coord.nated through a aingle point of contact in the Program P h n s and M a n y e m m i Systems Office. OD I4 D

lncflvldurl d e m e n t for points of contact vlll be &sigrurcd by chc responsible Project M ~ Ner and the m n provided to the Program Plans and Management t y r t c r n l Office. These individuals will be responsiblc for these duties outlined in paragraph 6.b.

¶. . .. ..

0 Guidelines Approximately * r e mb prior to the USFC Shuttle Projects FRR, guiaelimr rill be prepared by Procram P h s ud U u u p m m t Systems O f f h and Issurd by h e Y a n p r , Shuttle Project& atabllshln~ Projects FRR &te, Shuttle Projects FRR &a, wlth appliuble memkrshlp, and my specld requiremmts not s v c r e d by l h i s prardvc

tFFECWEDATC

¶TNs procedure i s effective on date of l u u .

¶R& t. LIndrtrorn Y a q e r , Shuttle Projects

392

¶SOP 8000.1 ca S A O I I b . idvlngood SAOl/Mr. Askew S h O b / M r . Harden S A I IIMr. Lombudo SAJIIMr. Brldwrll SA1IIMr. Mulloy SAYIIMI. Taylor Sh711Mr. Bore S M I/*. ioiler LhOIIMr. Kingsbury EAOIIDr. T h m m EEOlIMr. Hardy EEI IIMr. Horron EC21IYr. Thomaron EE3IIMr. Nichols tE51fMr. Goerr ECOIIMr. Brook LGO3IMr. B u m EBOIIMr. Bradford EHOIIYr. Jchwingbmer EfOllDr. Deader EPOIIMr. McCool EPC3IMr. W o r l d EL0 IIMr. Hop- E W 1lDr. McDonough ElOl/Yr. Taylor PWIIMr. Manhall TMI/Mr. Odom NAOlIMr. ThanU JAOIIMr. born). DAOIILZ. L u a s DmllMr. Lee DEOllMr. B e h y DROlIMr. S n n d

. -0 n

393