Report of Special Counsel Jack Smith, Volume One: The Election Case

THE CERTIFICATION OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE

THE CERTIFICATION OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE

HELD ON JANUARY 6, 2021

Special Counsel Jack Smith Submitted Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c)

Washington, D.C. January 7, 2025

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE: THE ELECTION CASE — 1

  • I. THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION — 2

  • A. Mr. Trump's Pressure on State Officials — 8

  • B. Mr. Trump's Fraudulent Elector Plan — 11

  • C. Mr. Trump's Misuse of Official Power Through the Justice Department — 16

  • D. Mr. Trump's Pressure on the Vice President — 20

  • E. Mr. Trump's Supporters Attack the United States Capitol — 23

  • II. THE LAW — 33

  • A. Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371) — 34

  • B. Obstruction and Conspiracy to Obstruct (18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) and (c)(2)) — 45

  • C. Conspiracy Against Rights (18 U.S.C. § 241) — 49

  • D. Defenses — 53

  • E. Other Charges — 61

  • F. Co-Conspirator Liability — 67

  • III. THE PRINCIPLES OF FEDERAL PROSECUTION — 68

  • A. Prosecuting Mr. Trump Served Multiple Substantial Federal Interests — 69

    1. The substantial federal interest in protecting the integrity of the electoral process and the peaceful transfer of power was served by Mr. Trump's prosecution — 69
    1. The substantial federal interest in counting every citizen's vote was served by Mr. Trump's prosecution — 74
    1. The substantial federal interest in protecting election officials and other government officials from violence was served by Mr. Trump's prosecution — 75
    1. The substantial federal interest in the evenhanded administration of the law was served by Mr. Trump's prosecution — 83
11
  • B. Mr. Trump Was Not Subject to Effective Prosecution in Another Jurisdiction — 87

  • C. There Was No Adequate Non-Criminal Alternative to Prosecution — 88

  • D. Mr. Trump's Conduct Had No Historical Analogue — 90

  • IV. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE AND POLICY — 92

  • A. The Investigative Process — 92

  • B. Investigative and Prosecutive Procedures in an Election Year — 95

    1. The Department's Election Year Sensitivities Policy — 96
    1. Pre-Indictment Procedures — 99
    1. Post-Indictment Procedures — 100
  • V. INVESTIGATIVE CHALLENGES AND LITIGATION ISSUES — 107

  • A. Pre-Indictment Litigation with Third Parties — 108

    1. The Twitter/X Search Warrant — 108
    1. Legislative Privilege Under the Speech or Debate Clause — 110
  • B. Threats and Harassment ofWitnesses — 112

  • C. Mr. Trump's Claims of Executive Privilege — 116

  • D. Presidential Immunity — 122

    1. Prosecutorial Decisions During the Charging Stage — 123
    1. Immunity Litigation — 126
    1. Unresolved Issues Regarding Presidential Immunity — 132
  • VI. CONCLUSION — 136

  • APPENDIX: KEY FILINGS IN SIGNIFICANT LITIGATION — 138