United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.: Amended Final Opinion

Defendants' Organizations Focused on ETS Issues

Defendants' Organizations Focused on ETS Issues

  1. From the 1970s forward, members of the Enterprise, specifically Philip Morris, Reynolds, Lorillard, B&W, BATCo, and the Tobacco Institute on behalf of its member companies, pooled their resources and coordinated their activities with respect to passive smoking, or environmental tobacco smoke ("ETS"), issues through a variety of committees and organizations (discussed in detail at Section V(G)(6), infra). The aims of the many different industry ETS organizations were to coordinate an industry position on passive smoking and to fund projects that would generate data supporting the industry's position that tobacco smoke was not a proven health risk to nonsmokers.

  2. The first industry committee dedicated specifically to addressing ETS concerns was formed as early as 1975. The committee, chaired by Shook, Hardy & Bacon counsel Don Hoel, met under the direction of the Research Liaison Committee to address ETS-specific projects which, at the time, were funded via Special Account 4. 1003293761-3763 (US 86502); 1003293752-3753 (US

199

20169), (US 75204); 500294698-4698 (US 24145); 504126505-6507 (US 24216); 03638976-8979 (US 46483); 01337388-7388 (US 86504). Regular members of this committee, sometimes referred to as the Public Smoking Committee or Advisory Group, included company scientists from Reynolds, Philip Morris, B&W, and Lorillard. 1000125386-5386 (US 86505); 504339411-9412 (US 86506).

  1. Defendants reestablished this committee in 1984 under the name of the Tobacco Institute ETS Advisory Committee, or TI-ETSAG. ETSAG met almost monthly to propose, review, and manage scientific projects that the Committee of Counsel approved for funding. Regular members of ETSAG also included company scientists from Reynolds, Philip Morris, B&W, and Lorillard, in addition to Tobacco Institute representatives, Don Hoel, and Covington & Burling attorney John Rupp. 2021004058-4064 (US 20339). While neither Liggett nor American directly participated in ETSAG, both participated with the funding of approved projects. Id. at 4058; see also Adams PD, United States v. Philip Morris, 6/18/02, 226:15-235:20, 236:2-237:24, 255:24-256:18, 257:8-20, 262:13-263:5, 266:7-268:18, 284:1-24, 285:5-289:6.

  2. The Center for Indoor Air Research ("CIAR") was formally established in 1988 to carry out industry-funded research related to passive smoking; the original charter members were Defendants Philip Morris, Reynolds, and Lorillard. 506300804-0814 at 0804 (US 20756); 506647151-7156 at 7151 (US 20761); 321141105-1144 at 1142 (US 20588); TIMN0014390-4393 (US 62782); 2071412978-3143 at 3082-3096 (US 23061*); 506662315-2316 (US 75277). See also Adams PD, United States v. Philip Morris, 6/19/02, 302:4-15, 304:5-306:11. Although CIAR had a Scientific Advisory Board to review the merit of project proposals, only the CIAR Board of Directors had authority to approve a project for funding. Moreover, a large number of industryfavorable CIAR projects were approved directly by the CIAR Board of Directors without any review by its SAB. 517577761-7761 (US 20867).

200
  1. These committees and organizations furthered Defendants' collective goals by: (1) coordinating and funding Defendants' efforts to generate evidence to support its position that there remained an "open controversy" as to the health implications of exposure to ETS; (2) leading the attack on the Government's efforts to act on evidence linking ETS to disease; and, (3) in the case of CIAR, appearing to be an independent research funding organization when it was really a facade for concealing industry participation in certain studies.