VIII-J

¶TO:. DistriSuiion

¶FXOX: SAOl/Yz. Lindsiroa

¶The S h t i t l e Projec:s

¶€0-

-. O i f i c e has e s r a b l i s h e d a requLremest idenr5iica:ion o r 12cnck c o r s z r a i o t s f o r p r o b l a s being

¶reporzed t o t h e l !X ?roSle=: Assessaen? S y s i e n (PAS) by

¶! elezenc co:.:zpciors :' Each elmen: c c n c r a c z c r ( X o c k e r a F e . P?-fC, USBI, and Thib'Kol) has bee3 d l r e c r e d K O su?porr t h i s reqciremenz by proviling l a x ~ c h constrzrin: infozziaiion 01'- each n e s p r o b l a subrririec r3 rbe p15FC P A S . R e laurrck c i n s r r a i a r Ln.nfor=aticr. provided bp Khe c o n i z a c i o r is based upor! their p r a i i s l n a r q - cetbnical e v a l u a t i o n an& b-Lll r e q u i r e f i n a l conc&-rence by t h e r e s p o r s i b l e elenen; p r o j e c t manager.

¶a. Tce follozing guzdellnes hnve b e e s e s t a b l i s h e d r o a i l iz making c o z s t r i i n t decisior.5 03 open problems and. a r e l-rec t o reczrrence conrro1 cece-icmtion o S p . In a c c o r l z n c e w i t 5 p r a c t i c e s e s r a b l i s h e n on pas: p r c g r t u , r e z e d i s 1 ac:ions Ce.g. rmovnl an2 r e p i a c a e n i : of d e i e c z i v e hard-dare, etc:). for C O T - r e c r i n g i i s c = e ? a n c i e s on Khe v e k i c l e co b e larrnched a r e con- sidere? l a a n c n canstraLD=s an6 a r e c r a c k e d b y . c h e IZSC sysrem,.

¶(1) A l l open p r o b l m s coded c r i t i c a l i t y 1, 1R.²² Rogers Commission Report, Volume I, p. 199. o bid., Chart SRB-4. 2 1 Larry Mulloy, NASA, Marshall Space Fli ht Center, "STS-51L Level I1 Flight Readiness Review,'' January 14,1986. See Appendix VIII-g. 2 2 Discussion with Allan McDonald, September 4, 1986. Z3 Rogers Commission Report, Volume 11. See Chart 15 (p. H-10) and Chart 19 (p. H-12). s Ibid., Chart 30 (p. H-18). , o r 2R w i l l be considered l a m c h c o n s e r a i n t s u n r i l resolved (recurrence c o n t r o l e s t a b l i s h e d and i c s i n u l r r p e n r a r i o n exectiv%:y derermined) r s d f i c i e n r r a r i b n a l e . i.e..

.r g - r a r l o n , oe d i f f e r e s i ccn= t c . , CKFSKS' co concluae thaK C h i s problem vill no; oc=';z on t h e f l i g h ~ v e h i c l e d u r i n g prelaunch, launch. o r f l i g k .

.. (2) Pro'c;e=s code? c r i z l c a l i i y 3 will noK b e COR-

¶s i d e r e d laszc5 ccxs;r;ir.rs ur-less (a) the p o r e n t i a l e x i s t s 0 5 leadi?g KO a c r i z l c i i i t y 1 o r 2 f a i l u r e mode; or (b) t h e f a i l e a c o q s - e s z has E:U?:iaie coe on rhe elenecr: anc more thzz one oc=uzzence c r d t leai C D a cr<:icalicy 2 condition; '

¶-- or ( c ) the f a i i u r e couid r e s u l t i n m u l t i p l e lcss of fligh: xxizrmer.:.i:ig: c:-.;nnols, A:²² Rogers Commission Report, Volume I, p. 199. o bid., Chart SRB-4. 2 1 Larry Mulloy, NASA, Marshall Space Fli ht Center, "STS-51L Level I1 Flight Readiness Review,'' January 14,1986. See Appendix VIII-g. 2 2 Discussion with Allan McDonald, September 4, 1986. Z3 Rogers Commission Report, Volume 11. See Chart 15 (p. H-10) and Chart 19 (p. H-12). s Ibid., Chart 30 (p. H-18). c r i t i c a l i t y 3 i s decemined t o b e a iac2c.i cczs:zzLsz, i- vill be i r e a c e d t h e s w e a s a . 0 ) above.

435

, -. b . To a s s u r e tha: e a c h r e i o r c e d p r o b l e a i s r e v i e w e d

¶f a r c o r = e c t c r i t i c a l i t y and c o h s t r a h t assFgFaen.; by t h e a q r o p r i z t e !?!.IsPC p e r s o n n e l , t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o c e d u r e w i l l b e f o llcved :

¶(1) The r e s p o c s i b l e S b E desigr. a c r i o n e e and t h e eleoent p r o j e c t o f f i c e aczionee w i l l revtew e a c h p r o b l m u?cz r e c e i p t t o z s s u r e t h a t t h e c r i t i c a l i c y a n d COnSCZaiZt

¶. . zsslgr=ez:s nee: w i t h t h e i r approval. Excep:;ons to . &'

¶-_.. c r i r r c z L i r y or cons:rain: zssiF=en: w i l l be c c o r l i n a z e d L.i L cbe Pro5I.m A s s e s s z e n t C e n t e r (?AC) a c t i o n e e w i t h i c r ;o v c r k i n g Cays fzcn r e c e i p c of €he ~ r o ' c l e r !r e p o r t .

¶(2) Tie . P r o b i e r P s s e s s E e n t Ce3:er ~ 5 1 1 prepzre a weekly c3ns:rzin:s l i s t by e l e z e n c . 'i%isl i s t will b e

¶--L-l--ed to t b e S h c z t l e R&QX S u ? p o r r O i f i = e , EGD3,. for S"^" iz?u: t o t h e S:?uzrLe ? r = 3 j e c f s . & = a g e r , SAO1. C o ? l e s o f &:.e c - cocs:rainr 15s: b i l l be f c r n l s k e d c ' o n c - i r r e n r l y co eacl? S h c t t l e Elezaenz P r o j e c : Ykrrager.

. (3) L a ~ i c kc o z s r r a i n t s w i l l b e r e v i e w e d a t eac5 -

¶Frobleci Review bozrd (I=) n e s c i n g .

¶c

¶3 . e Probler! A-ssessment Center w i l l be responsible for cccr<5rz;Lng a i l l a c n c k c m s t r a i n : a c r i v i t y an2 ass-;ring - + - - 1-2 -.-c -- ~. . ~ - : o ~i s p r o p e r l y docymented i n the I r ~ b l a

¶-v

¶A s s e s s a e z r Sys;eo (3.G) 2z:z b a s e a n d c r z r i s m i r z e d co F!?C rrrssz e=enc.

¶/-

;[J { - - . .

\ 1

¶P.o5erz E. Lincsircn Panager Shxczle P r o j e c t s O f f i c e D i s trfbu:ion: S e e page 3

¶EG21/G. Butler

¶EGZZ/T. T u r r , e r / R . D o n a l d s o n / S . Wig~i-s/R: S e l l y / C . Soprzno/

¶R. Jackson/J. Gross/R. R i e m e r

¶EG23/E. B o a r d / D . H e r Z a / D . GlaCish/A. T o , ? u e l l a

¶EG2 4/E. Lowe/J. Davis/Z. B a k e r / B . N r s e l l e y

¶EY 0 1 / R . S c h w i a q n u e r

¶ELOl/?. I s b e l l

¶EPOl/A. Mecool. . E?13/C. G a i n e s / E . E n g l e r m . Earr~sar?

¶EP 14/B - Nein/R. W h i t e / R . B e c k / W . Ru.?E;le/?.. Dstson/ii. Bell

¶2?21/0. Goet=/G. S n i t h / E . Sacchs

¶E?²² Rogers Commission Report, Volume I, p. 199. o bid., Chart SRB-4. 2 1 Larry Mulloy, NASA, Marshall Space Fli ht Center, "STS-51L Level I1 Flight Readiness Review,'' January 14,1986. See Appendix VIII-g. 2 2 Discussion with Allan McDonald, September 4, 1986. Z3 Rogers Commission Report, Volume 11. See Chart 15 (p. H-10) and Chart 19 (p. H-12). s Ibid., Chart 30 (p. H-18). 2 /R .

¶E?23/P. E?25/J. Ei'31JG. Geller

¶E?³³ NASA, "Report to the President Actions to Implement the Recommendations of the Presi- dential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident," July 14, 1986. (Hereafter r e ferred to as NASA Response to Rogers Commission.) s bid.. Chart 3-1. 2/M. E?³³ NASA, "Report to the President Actions to Implement the Recommendations of the Presi- dential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident," July 14, 1986. (Hereafter r e ferred to as NASA Response to Rogers Commission.) s bid.. Chart 3-1. 3 / F --.I?.

¶rr-.5/'=.

¶E?.: 3/Z -Distziburion: (Cont'd)

437 438

¶U